ESPR Is Not Getting Delayed. Here Is What That Actually Means for Your Brand.
- Rodica

- Mar 26
- 4 min read
Be honest. When someone mentions another EU sustainability regulation, what is your first reaction?
If the answer is somewhere between a weary sigh and a quiet assumption that it will probably get pushed back, delayed, watered down or quietly filed in the drawer marked "deal with later," you are in very good company. The last few years have not exactly built confidence in regulatory timelines.

CSRD got scaled back. The green claims directive went on hold. The EU deforestation regulation got delayed. So it is entirely reasonable that somewhere in your brain, Digital Product Passports have been lumped in with the rest of the "EU stuff that keeps moving" pile.
Here is the thing though. ESPR is not in that pile.
The regulation that is actually on track
The Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation, ESPR, is the legislation underpinning Digital Product Passports. And unlike much of what has come before it, it is moving forward on schedule.
The direction of travel has been getting stronger and more specific, not weaker. The EU's Joint Research Centre, which informs the EU's recommendations for ESPR, has been publishing more and more detailed guidance.
Scoring systems for durability, repairability and recyclability are being developed. The infrastructure behind how passports will be registered, verified and amended is starting to become clear.
And critically, the first real measure is already in motion.
The ban on destruction of unsold textiles and footwear comes into force in July 2026 for large companies. That is not a vague future commitment. That is a hard date.
Mandatory DPP implementation follows in 2027. Full passports are required by 2030.
Why this matters for SMEs specifically
Here is where it gets interesting for smaller brands. Unlike a lot of EU regulation that has size thresholds baked in, ESPR does not.
It will affect businesses across the board, from a major high street retailer selling thousands of styles to a small brand shifting a handful of dresses a season.
That might sound like a headache. But it is also an opportunity.
The brands that move now, before the compliance pressure arrives, get to do this on their own terms. They get to treat it as a strategic project rather than a last minute scramble.
They get to build their data foundations properly rather than throwing something together in eighteen months with the deadline breathing down their neck.
The ones that wait will be doing all the same work, just at higher cost, with worse data quality and a team that resents the whole thing before it has even launched.
What the brands doing this well are doing differently
There are already brands out there that have moved. Luxury houses, mid-market independents, smaller labels with no mega budgets. And the ones getting the most value from it are consistently doing three things that the others are not.
They are treating it as a data programme, not a QR code project. The QR code on the label is the last five minutes of the work. The actual project is understanding where your product data lives, who holds it, whether it is accurate and how to get it into one place.
Start there, not at the label.
They are not waiting for perfect regulation. There is already enough published guidance to start auditing your data gaps right now.
Every season you spend waiting for complete clarity is a season you could have spent building the foundation that the passport will sit on.
The brands piloting and learning now will be in a completely different position to the ones who are still watching and waiting.
They have got the right people in the room. DPPs touch design, sourcing, IT, compliance, marketing and your supplier relationships all at once.
The brands making real progress have a named lead with enough seniority and mandate to bring those teams together and keep them there. Not a committee. One person with a brief.
If any of this sounds familiar, it is because we covered the ownership challenge in Part 1 of this series. If you missed it, it is worth a read before you continue. The data and the people are two sides of the same problem.
The commercial case is real
It would be easy to read all of this as a compliance story. And yes, staying ahead of regulation is part of it.
But the brands doing this well are not talking about it as a compliance win. They are talking about consumer trust, supply chain transparency, the ability to credibly tell the story of a product and the commercial opportunity in the growing resale and repair market.
A Digital Product Passport is the infrastructure that makes all of that possible. It turns a vague sustainability commitment into something verifiable, shareable and genuinely useful to the person who just bought your jumper and wants to know where the wool came from.
The compliance piece is the floor. The commercial opportunity is the ceiling. Most brands are currently focused entirely on whether they need to worry about the floor, which means almost no one is thinking about the ceiling.
So where does this leave you?
If you have been assuming DPPs were safely in the "deal with it later" category, now is a reasonable moment to revisit that.
Not with panic, and not with a full scale transformation programme that takes over your entire roadmap.
But with a clear-eyed look at where your product data actually sits today, who in your business needs to be part of the conversation, and what a sensible first step looks like given your size, your season cycle and your current systems.
That is exactly what a DPP readiness call is designed to help you work out. Thirty minutes, no jargon, and you leave with a clear next step rather than a longer list of things to worry about.
If that sounds useful, the link is below.
Not quite there yet? Grab the checklist first here.
This is Part 2 of DPPs Demystified, a series breaking down Digital Product Passports for fashion and textile SMEs without the jargon. Read Part 1 here: Who Actually Owns Your DPP?



Comments